Milton friedman 1970 essay

Milton Friedman and the Social Responsibility of Business Milton Friedman and the Social Responsibility of Business Joel Makower Friday, November 24, - pm The most provocative statement of the past half-century on the role of business in society came in an essay in the New York Times, written by a fellow named Friedman.

I have been impressed time and again by the schizophrenic character of many businessmen. That is the piece that Mr. Employees want more than a paycheck. Moreover, he maintained, companies that did adopt "responsible" attitudes would be faced with more binding constraints than companies that did not, rendering them less competitive.

Milton friedman 1970 essay

No one would engage in a business contract with a corporation if they thought for one minute that a corporation was not responsible to pay its bills, for example. However, to ensure that financial sustainability of the corporation is not eroded, deontic constraints that recognise the right of shareholders to a reasonable return, need to be put in place. In conclusion, directors do not have total freedom to maximise profit as they have to act within both the legal and ethical rules of the game. So clearly, therefore, a corporation can have legal, but also moral responsibilities. The advertising industry has taken a low blow at society and needs to focus their attentions on preserving human decency and uphold a higher standard of moral concern. The rules of the game have changed in fundamental ways -- and people today expect and demand more of business than simply that they maximize their profits without coming to grief by some violation of law. Getting enough to eat is a requirement of life; life's purpose, one would hope, is somewhat broader and more challenging.

Shareholder theory has been criticized by proponents of Stakeholder theorywho believe the Friedman doctrine is inconsistent with the idea of corporate social responsibility to stakeholders. There are some re spects in which conformity appears unavoidable, so I do not see how one can avoid the use of the political Mechanism altogether.

milton friedman profit for shareholders

But it helps to strengthen the already too prevalent view that the ptirsuit of profits is wicked and im moral and must be curbed and con trolled by external forces. Conforming within acceptable legal limits may keep them out of court, but companies know well that holding themselves accountable to a higher standard will keep them in good stead with their customers, employees, shareholders, suppliers, regulators and communities.

Although Friedman is clear that directors as agents of the business have to play within the rules of the game, this still leaves room for unethical behaviour.

rethinking the social responsibility of business summary

They can do good—but only at their own expense. He may feel impelled by these responsibilities to devote part of his income to causes he regards as worthy, to refuse to work for particular corporations, even to leave his job, for example, to join his country's armed forces.

In an ideal free market resting on private property, no in dividual can coerce any other, all cooperation is voluntary, all parties to such cooperation benefit or they need not participate.

Another 35 percent without formal programs conduct regular reviews of these activities.

Explain how the philosophy of milton friedman played a role in managements decision

Friedman's argument missed. Friedman interprets this principle as the corporation with the highest return to shareholders. There is, however, a problem with applying standard consequentialist theories where we are required to maximise agent-neutral value. So the debate continues unabated: What, exactly, is businesses' responsibility? Following the utilitarian adage of providing the greatest good for the greatest number of people, 10 companies are ethically obliged to participate in socially responsible activities that maximise the total welfare of all stakeholders. Among the key findings: Two-thirds say corporate citizenship and sustainability issues are of growing importance for their businesses. The occasion of Friedman's recent passing offers an opportunity to revisit that argument. Milton Friedman and Corporate Social Responsibility Friedman argued for a direct form of capitalism and against any activity that distorts economic freedom.

Following the utilitarian adage of providing the greatest good for the greatest number of people, 10 companies are ethically obliged to participate in socially responsible activities that maximise the total welfare of all stakeholders.

Rated 7/10 based on 29 review
Download
Milton Friedman and the Social Responsibility of Business